Mind you this only applies to the use of Cubase.Īlmost everyone is familiar with the Korg nano controllers. However, if you choose a higher channel than 8, the X-Touch One does not display anything, so the controller does not synchronize with the selected channel. In other words, if I select channels 1-8 in the DAW mixer with the computer mouse, the X-Touch One follows without any problems. There are some inconsistencies in using the controller with Cubase because the X-Touch One always remains in an 8-channel group – unless you ask it to do so yourself. So, everyone should find out beforehand or try out what works with the DAW controller. With other DAWs, the mentioned problems don't seem to arise.
#Pro tools control surface update#
With the firmware update 1.07, there were already improvements, but the X-Touch One for Cubase is currently not fully recommendable. This makes the area of application correspondingly large but leads to some inconsistencies in combination with Cubase.Ĭubase users can only hope that Behringer/Steinberg will find a way to integrate the controller even better. Since the controller works on a Mackie/HUI basis, it is compatible with all common DAWs. You don't need to worry about the intended use in the studio. The housing consists of an aluminum/plastic mix. With the X-Touch One, Behringer is expanding its range of DAW controllers to include a compact model with just one (motor) fader. It' works best with the in-house DAW Studio One if you want a truly plug-and-play experience. However, depending on the DAW, you have to make some compromises here and there. Working with the Presonus Faderport 8 is a lot of fun, intuitive and purposeful. Also, the touch sensitivity can be adapted to your own needs. For example, the speed of the faders can be set on a scale from 1-7. Presonus receives extra praise for the ability to adjust the FaderPort 8. It doesn't work in Ableton and Sonar either, but it does in Logic and Studio One. Pressing the All button only opens the Channel Settings window. The fact that the “Mix Management” functions, with the help of which you can adjust the mixer view of all channels on virtual instruments, buses, or VCAs, does not work under Cubase is extremely unfortunate. Compared to the competition, the motorized faders are very quiet. The optics and the clarity of the controls, thanks to the backlit soft buttons, are also very good. With it, you can physically control a large number of parameters in the DAW. The Presonus Faderport 8 is a very good DAW controller.
If you need options for a specific DAW, refer to our top picks for: With this in mind, let's take a closer look at the best control surfaces you can buy right now. As long as it helps you “control” the DAW, we consider it to be a “control surface”. It includes everything from MIDI controllers and mixers to dedicated DAW controllers. Keep in mind that the definition of a “control surface” itself is hazy. Fine changes and automations, always hard to do with the mouse, feel tighter and more intuitive when you do it with a control surface. Most importantly, a control surface brings back, well, control to your production. Panning feels more natural when you have a rotary knob to do it. It adds a layer of intuitiveness to your production that a keyboard or mouse or even a MIDI controller can't offer. And at that point, you should invest in a control surface.Ī control surface essentially brings your DAW out of your computer screen and onto your desk.
0 kommentar(er)
